I have received a number of replies to our media releases from those who have not bothered to read the book and yet had the audacity to call me a fool who should first learn science before claiming that current science is flawed. In response I’ve sent them the following essay, which I post here:

Ah, science!

How we look up to it, as a form of a saviour of our human shortcomings. How we love and respect science, by presuming it to be a representation of an honoured physical truth. How we embrace it as a method by which to push aside all opposition to our quest for ‘human advancement’. Yes, science, derived from Latin ‘scientia’: knowledge: our intended intellectual connection to our drive for perfection (which, supposedly, is to be obtained from our selfish desire to regulate, control, and manipulate all that we can grasp on this planet). Oh, yes, good ol’ science: the means by which we, as humans, intend to fashion our own destiny as a species, not just here on this planet but across the whole Universe. Thanks to science nothing is impossible for us; nothing can stand in our way to eternal bliss where all humans can live happily ever after, with no shortages to any wants of anything.

And yet, when one takes an honestly impartial, critical look at the physical state of this planet and all its inhabitants – following but a few thousand years under the influence of the latest model of Sapient Sapient humans – it becomes glaringly obvious that the above sentiments reflect nothing but human pipe dreams. Mere wishful thinking.

Despite all those who hold the notion of science-the-saviour close to their rapidly beating hearts, science – as we currently know it – cannot, in fact, solve all that which humans perceive to be the limitations, obstacles, and problems arising before them. Why? Because the basics of current science are flawed: if the actual knowledge – science – was not flawed, then humans would have long ago had known who and what they are, and of what everything is physically made of. They then would have known that there are limitations to what they can do with the finite natural resources at their disposal, and use them sparingly, rather than needlessly squander them at an accelerating rate in pursuit of temporary financial profits.

Most importantly, science would have been viewed differently. It would not have been the realm of fantasy, or fiction, but only that of a physical reality: of the physical truth and only the physical truth. And the basics of science – the process of knowledge acquisition – would be referred to as: physicalistics.

Physicalistics? What in heavens is that? Statistics of physical events?

No. Physicalistics is actually a language of physical reality. In the language of mathematics, for instance, anything is possible. With mathematics physical reality is considered to be of no importance, or rather of no existence. As an example of this, in mathematics a physical nothingness of vacuum space can be calculated to contain cavities and holes. In physical reality, however, no such physical existence can be possible, nor is it, as a nothingness of vacuum space cannot be parted, or divided, or structured, as it is a nothingness, and only physical objects and bodies – made of solid particles – can be present in a vacuum nothingness as a somethingness. In other words, mathematics can presume the existence of fourth and fifth dimensions, and that there are individual positives and negatives, while physicalistics knows that there are no individual positives and negatives, for in all physical existence – beginning with the most singular particles of mass, which I’ve named ‘inunens’ (individual units of energy) – everything is simultaneously positive and negative, and all that they form is also both positive and negative simultaneously. After all, this is the very reason for, what I call, the ‘boundary of influence’ in all physical structures, which ultimately result in the simultaneous physical attractions and repulsions that cause the inevitable effects of the so-called ‘gravitation’. (For more explicit explanation of this see the ‘Revelations of a Human space Navigator, Second Edition’.)

It is this kind of physicalistic language – based on physical reality derived from factually comprehended observation and logical reasoning – that separate the language of physicalistics from all other forms of communication that accept unreality as viable options, including those of religions and current science.

Think this to be an absurdity? Very well, let’s pick a topic. Any topic. With me being the moderator, I choose to select something juicy and worthwhile. Something with some gravitas. Or rather, without any. Let’s make it: ‘time’. This should serve as a good example of physicalistics and as proof that the basics of current science are flawed.

Currently, and for all the past human existence, ‘time’ had been readily accepted as a physical reality, which is supposed to affect everything and everyone in physical existence, even though it is acknowledged to be a mystery as to what it actually is, considering that it has never been seen, or felt, or witnessed: just like any god. Despite this, all physics and chemistry scientific principles are based on the concept of ‘time’. After all, ‘time’ is a vital part of all current scientific notions, including that of ‘Theory of Relativity’, devised by you know whom.

So let’s quickly examine the assumed physical properties of ‘time’.
A. It has no physical appearance.
B. It cannot be physically felt, or touched, or examined.
C. It is assumed to be responsible for all physical activity, for without ‘time’ everything supposedly would become inactive: frozen in stillness.
D. It is assumed to be responsible for all the change that supposedly produces the events that are of the ‘past’, the ‘present’, and the ‘future’.
E. It is assumed to comprise of zones, or regions, or dimensions, such as the fourth dimension.
F. It is assumed to slow down with very high velocity, and in the process influence all that’s in that slowed down zone, or region, or dimension of ‘time’ to reduce its natural rate of aging, or decomposition.
G. It is assumed to have been ‘created’ at the moment of the ‘Big Bang’, together with the vacuum space.

It would have helped those reading this article to have read the first segment of the ‘Revelations of a Human Space Navigator, Second Edition’, which deals not just with all the points mentioned above but with the explanation of what everything that’s physical is physically formed of, and how the very physical structures of inunens – the individual particles that form everything – cause the physical behaviour of everything that appears as physical change of movement in the form of heat and light. Still, even without that knowledge it’s possible to deal with the question of ‘time’.

In order to achieve this, let us conduct a little hypothetical experiment. Let us place two almost identical leaves from a same tree next to each other, out in the hot sun. If ‘time’ were to exist, then such placement of leaves would obviously represent a situation where the two similar objects are contained within the same ‘time’ zone. As ‘time’ in a specific ‘time’ zone, or ‘time’ region, or ‘time’ dimension is assumed to be constant for that zone, or region, or dimension, it therefore can be safely concluded that the two similar leaves from the same tree, and placed next to each other, shall simultaneously dry out in the light and heat of the sun, so that their overall dehydration and dispersal would be identical.

Now, a refrigeration unit is brought into the area (‘time’ zone, or ‘time’ region, or ‘time’ dimension) where the two leaves dried out, became brittle, and fell apart. Another two leaves are brought into this same arena, but in this instance one leaf is placed inside the refrigeration unit while its twin is placed on top of the refrigeration unit, fully exposed to the heat and light of the sun.

Mind you, if the earlier attributes to ‘time’ are examined, then the point E would attest to ‘time’ being zonal, or regional, or dimensional, so that if ‘time’ were to exist it would effect similarly all that which would be within that zone, region, or dimension, irrespective of where they were. After all, many humans age and die after living similar amount of years, irrespective of whether they lived mostly in the sun or out of it; in the deserts or in the snows; with no humans living, let us say, to the age of one-hundred and fifty years just because they lived hidden away from the sun altogether.

And yet, what do we find with the two leaves, with both of them being within the bounds of the presumedly same zone, or region, or dimension of ‘time’? Well, the leaf exposed to the heat and light of the sun has no alternative but to rapidly dry out within days, with these dried contents quickly dispersing into the surrounding elements, while but a small distance away the leaf inside the refrigerator is able to remain perceivably unchanged for weeks, if not months. Of course, the process of deterioration, or decomposition – which the language of physicalistics classifies as a ‘physical process of change’ – affects everything, irrespective of the duration and the speed of that physical process of change. The leaf inside the refrigerator shall gradually become soggy, limp, and mouldy. That’s because the physical processes of change taking place inside the refrigerator, and within the leaf itself, are different to the physical process of change taking place outside the refrigeration unit. And it is these varied physical processes of change that definitely cause different physical change to the two leaves, and not some mysterious, invisible and untouchable ‘time’.

So all physical actions, which result in physical reactions – and which then go on to result in ongoing physical chain-reactions – are the real, physical cause of all physical change, constantly taking place within all the chemical contents that is the Earth, and is the Solar System, and is the Milky Way Galaxy, and is all that is this Universe, and is all that are all universes – and not the non-existent ‘time’ in which all those in current science believe in, just like theists who believe in non-existent gods that also had never been seen, or felt, or examined.

‘Time’, in physical fact, plays no part in all that is physical, as it’s not needed by all that’s physical, because all physical activity is caused by physical entities having physical contacts and reactions with one another, and nothing else. For that’s what the physical process of change is.

But there is another element attributed to ‘time’: humans and other life forms become older – that is: decrepit  – and that is supposedly due to the direct effect of ‘time’.

Sadly, the function of all current sciences – not much different to those of the past – is that of humans looking but not seeing. While conducting billions-upon-billions of various experiments, like that of the Hadron Collider, they fail to add the basics of ‘two and two together’. This means that because the prime intention of their scientific experiments and recorded observations is to achieve personal glory and personal financial gain, they fail to grasp the physical essence of all their efforts. They fail to see the ‘BIG PICTURE’ even in minute things. And yet, it’s all there, set plainly before them. All they have to do is to apply physicalistics: an understanding that nothing but physical existence physically exists, and all that physical existence operates within the bounds of physical restrictions and limitations amongst themselves, within the boundless nothingness of vacuum space. But instead of this, what do all current scientists do?  They only glance at anything outside their perception and instantly dismiss it because of their dislike of physical reality and their love of imagination, which gives them their expectant hit of satisfaction from their acceptance of fiction and fantasy in their science.

Were humans more aware of physicalistics they would have long ago realised that all life forms on Earth comprise of two basic bodies of living intelligence. The first – because it first became dominant on this planet – is that of body-brains. These life forms comprises of bacteria, viruses, algae, and the sea-based and land-based flora. They are body-brains because their whole body structures conduct the intelligence of the whole.

The second basic body structure of intelligence on Earth is that of brain-bodies. Brain-bodies are all life forms on earth that comprise of a brain structure, where these brain structures – being the prime source of intelligence of those life forms – devise, implement, maintain, and evolve the bodies that they choose to surround themselves with, so as to use these bodies for the purpose of movement in space, for feeding them (the brains), and for procreating the future generations of their brains, together with their – if necessary, devised and evolved – bodies. And so, mammals, as all animals with a dedicated brain, are brain-bodies.

It is by such means that the mammal brains have devised diverse species with varying bodies for themselves. There are multitudes of land mammals, including humans. Then there are the brains of sea mammals, such as: sea lions, otters, seals, dolphins and even whales. There are also mammal brains that chose to fly as multitudes of various bats and flying foxes. There are mammal brains that used to have very large bodies and now have small bodies, such as those of beavers, and there were brains with very small bodies that now have large bodies, such as those of horses.

While all this may be interesting, a very important factor relating to all brain-bodies is that they – in the process of devising and maintaining their bodies – do so with acute awareness of the surrounding environment they inhabit. Unlike body-brains, brain-bodies adopt a span of life, so as to fit within the whole ecology of their environment. This results in tiny brains with tiny bodied having short life spans with short duration of reproduction but with huge quantities of that reproduction, while the large brains with large bodies choose to have longer life spans but with few offsprings. Human brains, as mammals, had chosen for themselves a duration of life longevity, which (depending on fate and personal life choices) equates to an average of 25,000 days, or around 68.5 years. This is, of course, a constant variable, which may individually fluctuate due to many factors, including the levels of availability of nutrition, life security, and a genetic (parental brain instruction transfer) instruction. But on the whole, it shall not alter an extension or a decrease to this duration of human life as it currently stands.

Therefore, this current human life span is in no way indebted to ‘time’ for its length of longevity, as it is attributed to no-one and nothing but to the very brains of human beings. This means that when human brains begin to implement changes to themselves and their bodies – just as they had done in the past – the life spans shall inevitably change: be it shorter or longer. In doing so, the human brains shall not consult any ‘time’ or be dictated by any ‘time’, but shall only have one consideration: how to best adapt to a changing environment on Earth, so as to prolong the longevity not of individuals but that of its species.

So how did the notion of ‘time’ come about, you may ask?

Due to the Earth’s daily rotations and its yearly elliptical orbits of the Sun, which provides the sense of ‘seasonal’ change at the same locations of Earth’s regions – it was inevitable that a sense of daily and seasonal change had entered the early human awareness. And not being able to grasp the physical attributes of the Earth’s rotating behaviour, and its orbiting relationship with the Sun, the early humans gained a sense of constant, ongoing change, which eventually became known as: ‘time’.  It is this sense and awareness of physical change occurring daily in every human life that became falsely attributed to a non-existent ‘time’; and because this sense and awareness of physical change occurring daily in every human life cannot be denied, the concept of ‘time’ had become so ingrained in human perception that it became accepted as a physical fact, despite being a non-existence, just like any other human-devised fantasies, such as: ghosts, devils, and gods.

The factor that fused in human perception the concept of ‘time’ to that of a physical reality was the eventual convention of accepting the division of a single Earth rotation into hours and minutes, and that of a single Earth’s orbit of the Sun into days and months. Using these conventions of measure – which actually represent the duration of physical process of change as it applies to this planet and its relationship with its sun and other planets and moons – humans came to accept the notion of ‘time’ as something that is so fundamental it needs no physical proof.

But what if ‘time’ were to exist?

As is explained in the ‘Revelations of a Human Space Navigator, Second Edition’, were ‘time’ to actually exist then a physical state of unreality would prevail as a physical reality. If ‘time’ were to exist, there would be eddies, vortexes, tides, whirlpools, depths and shallows of ‘time’; an environment not unlike that experienced by the life forms living in the oceans, seas and rivers. There would also be various slowing down and speeding up of ‘time’. There would be sudden, sharp fractures and ruptures it ‘time’, not unlike those in rock structures. Were ‘time to actually exist, then humans on Earth would live in chaos and uncertainty of what could and would befall them from ‘time’. ‘Time’ would freeze parts of them in other ‘time’ zones, or make parts of Earth disappear in ‘time’ to other parts of the world, or other ages, while bringing into existence on Earth, or elsewhere, sudden or gradual appearances of other worlds. Humans would disappear and dead bodies would appear out of nothingness (they would be dead bodies as no human can maintain life without nourishment, unavailable to them were they to be stuck in ‘time’ shifts indefinitely). ‘Time’ zones would have boundaries, so that entering another boundary of ‘time’ would cause bodies – or parts of bodies – to be sent to different periods in ‘time’, by that injuring and killing humans and damaging and destroying all else.

And do any of these unrealities physically occur on Earth? No. Have they ever taken place on Earth? No. And it’s clearly obvious why nothing like that had ever occurred or had ever likely to do so: ‘Time’ had never physically existed, does not physically exist, and never shall physically exist. For if it had, humans would certainly have know about it by now, in a bad, nasty, and sorry way.

Of course, there had been some feeble attempts to prove the physical existence of ‘time’. None of these scientific efforts could produce a single definitive shed of evidence that ‘time’ actually exists, even though – not surprisingly – those conducting the experiments concluded that they succeeded in proving that there is a potential that ‘time’ exists. In physical reality though, all that was actually proven was that variances in physical activity beget variances in physical responses to that physical activity. This means that physical process of change is prevalent in all physical activity, whereby even that initial physical activity is a physical process of change that goes on to produce ongoing and never-ending reactive physical processes of change. Therefore, ‘time’ – as some mysterious instigator of change – doesn’t actually exists, while the physical process of change physically exists, and is apparent in everything that is physical, everywhere.

Incidentally, would the physical processes of change responsible for a leaf inside a refrigeration unit on Earth be also similarly responsible for a physical process of change occurring to a leaf inside an identical refrigeration unit sent, for example, on a return journey to some far off object in vacuum space at the speed of light? Undoubtedly, but differently. There will always be resultant differences to activated physical processes of change, so that although the physical processes of change may differ from one-other, irrespective of any external velocity, they shall all remain restricted to their internal activity inside the leaf and the internal environment of the refrigerated unit, brought about by the motors of the refrigeration unit. And, by now expectantly, none of it – as a physical process of change – instigated by a non-existent ‘time’.

But is the non-existent ‘time’ the only concept that beguiles the understanding of human awareness, which leads to so much misunderstanding, which leads to so much inhumanity, selfishness, and devastation?

The answer to this is: No. The basics of current science are so flawed and these flaws so ingrained in human perception that there are really no simple means of reverting this trend of escalating scientific fraud, for that is what the intentionally defended flaws in current science are.

Ah, you will say, but what about all the wonderful things that science has provided for all humans? Look at all the benefits to all on Earth, all thanks to science!

And that’s true; scientific research, development, and application has altered human destiny: in the short term it has increased the longevity and comfort of some privileged individual human lives, while in the long term it is shortening the duration of human species.

You disagree? Then consider current topics of ‘global warming’ and ‘climate change’. All climate change deniers aside, the consensus of recorded data is that there are indisputable facts indicating that there are increasingly massive releases of human-responsible carbons into the atmosphere, which directly influence the dramatic raise in ocean temperatures, which results in increasingly erratic weather patterns that have a direct bearing on human food production, as well as, on all sea and land animals depending on a steady climate temperatures for their life and reproduction. These factors alone are alarming signs of danger to most species, including humans. But beyond carbon pollution, there are the accelerating eradications of natural habitats for many wild animals threatened with extinction, because humans claim more and more land for their own use, so as to feed, accommodate, and entertain their growing populations; there are dangerous depletions of fish stocks world-wide from over-fishing; there are massive increases in land and ocean pollution. And then there are the unsustainable depletions of minerals and other natural resources, which shall soon be unavailable to future human generations, as these resources shall all be rapidly – and often pointlessly – exploited and converted to pollution and other waste. All-in-all, not a pretty picture, is it?

So who then is actually responsible for all this human-made mess; something that those in science continue to assure they can rectify? Is it the fault of businesses that want to fulfil all societal greed and human needs in exchange for their own profit? Or is it the fault of individuals of all societies who have been taught by business to ‘want it all’ and to expect it ‘now’ for as little price and discomfort as possible?

It would be both simplistic and incorrect to blame the obvious, for there is another hidden culprit shirking its responsibility for all the human-made ills that befall all on this planet: the very science itself.

As difficult and improbable as it may seem, it is the science that’s the real cause of all the problems facing humans and all other species on Earth. While the cliché of a scientist is that of an absent minded, dust-jacketed Dr. Frankenstein, single-mindedly determined to ‘give life’ to his ‘creation’, totally oblivious to all consequences of such deed, the actual behaviour of science community is not that far off the mark. From the early days of human existence, most of those involved in science have exhibited little or no concern – or conscience – to the consequences of their work. With little or no regard for others, they did, and do, what interests and intrigues them, giving little or no thought to all the hazardous and damaging reactions that are bound to occur in response to their actions, and what kind of legacy they are leaving to those humans who should live in ten, hundred and million years from now.

Let us not kid ourselves: Today’s science has become the all powerful, unstoppable and unending force that sweeps all before it. It is all intrusive, all encompassing, and all controlling of each and every human life by becoming so bonded with business (and the business of government) that now science is BIG business, and from that all business existence depends on science. As business is only concerned with profits at the expense of all the resources that can be acquired and exploited as quickly as possible (fearing that someone else may beat them to this) science is all there – as business in its own right – eager and able to provide, at a monetary price, all that business requires.

And should opportunities come along for those in science to patent that which they had not devised but only uncovered the natural structure of – like the human gene DNA compositions – well, then, who needs morals and scruples when there’s money to be made from owning this.

Not that such callous, irresponsible, and greedy attitudes are openly admitted to by those in science. Instead, science is presented as a benevolent saviour of humanity: a righteous and moral source of inventions devised for the good of humanity, with innocent (but actually devious) intentions to bypass natural evolution by producing artificial evolutionary and behavioural directions by which humans will have to live, if they want to live at all.

The problem with science dominance of everyday life is that – as with any dictatorial power – any criticism of it is instantly met with hostility. Science, and all those who actually produce and uphold this product called ‘science’ – and all those who teach it – are adamant that no change should occur to their status quo. As far as they are concerned, it’s a case of: “Fuck with us at your own peril”. Their attitude is: “We know what we believe, and we believe what we choose to believe, and that makes us right, and anything to the contrary is erroneous, incorrect, and wrong; full stop”

In the past, men like Copernicus and Galileo had to content with the arrogant ignorance of the Catholic Roman Church, which dismissed science. Now it’s the very science – or rather those who uphold it, control it, and believe in all its nonsense, such as that of ‘time’ – who refuse to tolerate any information that challenges their accepted concepts.

This has resulted in all human societies being indoctrinated into believing fantasies, be they of religious or scientific kind, simply because science itself is wrapped up in fiction rather than the reality of physical truth.

As to all those who may accuse me of advocating a return to the Stone Age by refuting and ignoring science altogether, the answer is: “Not at all”. Physicalistics is not about obliterating knowledge but making it absolutely cleansed of fictional notions, such as those of: ‘time’. Instead, all scientific studies – be they: physics, chemistry, astronomy, psychology, sociology, or anything else – should abide by a common understanding of physical truth.

Were scientists – all scientists as individuals – to understand this, as well as, acquire an understanding of who and what they are as humans, there is little doubt that majority of them would re-evaluate the priorities of their intentions and stop behaving as prostitutes to business for the sake of their business. For that is what their current behaviour reflects: Want a bigger nuclear bomb and other weapons to kill more people? No problems, we (I) as scientists can build them for you; Want more coal dug out, to sell to more power plants and release more carbons into the atmosphere, to remain there as an agent of global warming? No problems, we (I) as scientists can work it all out, engineer it, and implement it for you; Want – for more productive farming – pesticide and dioxin compounds, which, unfortunately, shall then pollute the air and water all over this planet? No problem, we (I) as scientists can formulate them for you; Want us as scientists to jump higher, then lick your boots? No problems, we (I) as scientists would love to. Just flash your green cash and we (I) as scientists are at your beck and call; after all, while working for Hell we (I) as scientists just may win a Nobel, as well.

Ah, science!