Preamble:
In the process of promoting the book, I enjoy the help of some old friends, who assist in seeking online presence of appropriate people – perhaps you – for whom the book may be of interest: those who consider themselves as being freethinkers; those who present themselves as upholders of sciences: anywhere from physics and chemistry, to psychology; and those who claim to be interested in the so-called eternal questions, ranging from: 'who we are', to: 'what causes us to behave as we do', to: 'the meaning of life' – (all of which is explained in the book).

My written Press Releases are then sent online to these individuals, by my pals – my Media Team – on my behalf.

Having sent my press releases, the media team occasionally revisit those to whom the press releases were sent, to assess if there had been any online response from the recipients. In most instances I am not involved with any repercussions from the sent press releases. Occasionally, however, I'm informed by them when the recipients of my press release choose to degrade online the information presented in my press release. There would be nothing wrong with anyone criticizing my information were they to do so informatively: that is: after having read the book. What is not right, however, of such recipients, is to attack the claims included in my press release in ignorance: not having actually read the book.

Disappointingly (but not unexpectedly), while such individuals presume themselves to be astute, intelligent, and perceptive, in reality they are but accurate representations of their education systems; which, while insisting that any judgements be only made after physical examination of evidence, actually encourage the very opposite: to have students voice opinions they are taught by their educators, and not question what they are taught.

It may appear as futile to confront such individuals, as they abound everywhere. But without doing so, they only multiply. It is for this reason I make the effort to challenge such arrogantly ignorant humans, especially those who are deluded in presuming that their knowledge of science is beyond reproach.


One such person who chose degrade my press release, in abject ignorance, was Blake Stacey, to whom the following elailetter was sent.


To anyone wishing to read his comments, may do so here:
http://www.sunclipse.org/?p=387

Emailetter:

Dear Blake,

Re: Revelations of a Human Space Navigator, by Victor Senchenko

I should thank you for publishing my press release emailed to you by the volunteers on my media team.

It is also the same guys who had just recently trawled across your site again, bringing your commentary to my attention.

If you presume that I was upset, or insulted by your reaction to my press release, I was not. But neither was I amused by it. You were not witty, or insightful. Your commentary was really a repeat of all those who consider themselves as being bright, astute and clever, but who, in physical reality, are no less ignoramuses to those who scoffed at Copernicus, Galileo, and Columbus.

Allow me to explain why I accuse you as such***.

*** By your own admission, you had not bothered to read the book in question, prior to mocking it. If this is what you were taught to assess knowledge  – and I know it was not – then you had failed the first test of any basic principle of knowledge acquisition: examine it for yourself first-hand, if possible. For only then – and only then – can you possibly make an informed judgment. The key word here is: ‘informed’. Instead you chose to show your lack of professionalism of any scientist: to mock in ignorance. A shameful and undignified behavior, to be chastised by any pedagogue.

*** You mock the price of the book. Without having acquired all that the book provides by having read it, you have the gall to criticize a paltry price when university text books are valued in hundreds of dollars, the very text books that continue to broadcast the same human fiction elevated into science. If I were to examine your site, do you think I shall find a similar belittlement of the Large Hadron Collider, which is being completed for over four billion US dollars, by all accounts? Considering that this structure shall be no more successful at providing Higgs Particle than the smaller structures were, what price failure of human fiction to produce the meaning of ‘mass'? My book. How do I know this? Because I actually know what everything that is physical is physically made of, and why it physically behaves the way it does. From this I know why a head-on collision of protons shall not produce a heavy slow particle, because that is not how protons can physically behave, unlike those who do not know this; which is all the current physicists and chemists. Were you to read the book, you too would understand this.

*** It may appear to you that your behavior towards my press release is unique and individual. Actually, the very opposite would be true. By not knowing exactly who and what humans are, accounts for mass human behavior. Do you think that on the day of his death – the day his book was published (which, incidentally, provided no physical proof) – Copernicus was instantly feted and celebrated by the scientists and scholars of his day? Not so. Only few astute individuals, like Galileo, grasped the significance of his revelations at a much later date. (But without his book it may well be that his affirmation of Ptolemy’s revelations could have been delayed indefinitely). All the rest were scathing, abusive, and ridiculing. No much different to your attitude to my press release. But that is only to be expected from a person such as you, who knows not even the reason for his own behavior.

*** One of the most amusing reactions from those receiving our press release, is that those who paid huge amounts for their education, not only decry the paltry cost of the book, but presume that knowledge – irrespective how foreign to them – should be immediately understood by them, as if by magic. It is also these people, as yourself, who have expected an immediate, blissful, succulent scientific understanding of scientific principles they never previously fathomed, without having to do any hard work of reading and comprehending the contents of the book. I am sorry that I could not provide for you, and those similar to you, an instant scientific enlightenment from a press release, but sadly, I don't deal in miracles, simply the physical truth, which requires some levels of physically mental efforts of perusing and assessing the contents of the book.

*** There is a major revelation I make that you had fleetingly passed over. This comprises of my claim that ‘time’ does not physically exist. There are professors of physics and physicists who had examined the book. Irrespective of their opinions on much of what the “physicalistical” part of the book covers, not one of them was openly prepared to state that ‘time’ exists after having read the book. This means that there are a few humans – and their number is growing – who are becoming aware that physical ‘time’ neither does, nor can, physically exist. Therefore, the flaws in current sciences may not be widely spoken of, and widely known of – just yet – but they are causing some individuals a great deal of worry. That’s because once ‘time’ is understood and accepted for what it is: any physical duration of speed of the physical process of change, this shall cause a reappraisal of all current scientific theories, including ‘quantum’ – quite rightly – as all of them are flawed.

*** Currently, the miniscule knowledge humans possess (with all their ability to clone and manipulate genes – which they do merely for fiscal profit, while pretending to do this in the name of humanity – [read the book to understand ‘the meaning of life’, something that humans have no idea of, which is why they are over populating this planet: the major reason this little planet is being trashed]), in their individual and social cultural perceptions, they can only make two basic choices: they can believe in gods, or they can believe there are no gods. In each circumstance it’s a choice based on ‘belief’ and not knowledge of ‘knowing’. But what happens when a claim is made that a book is available in which knowledge is provided that not only gods do not exist, but that gods are not even needed by all that physically exists? It is rubbished, scoffer, or ridiculed. Not by theists, but by atheists. Why? Because these who do not believe in gods have no knowledge that it is physically possible to prove the non-existence of gods, something that atheists do not actually believe, as they are nothing but believers of their own perceptions; nothing more than another version of believers.

All that is required is the acquisition of knowledge provided in the book; the very book that you compare to an egg that you fear swallowing, incase the egg is rotten. That is precisely the attitude of humans to knowledge. They’ll swallow any bullshit that promises them the wholesome ever-after of eggs; the golden colors of egg yolk, whose yolks are colored by chemicals selected according to the color charts provided to egg producers (a physical fact); the chemical additives to color the egg shell to match color charts (a physical fact), rather than realize that real, free-range eggs, are dirty, speckled, often of unattractive color of shell, and even yolk, but so delicious, because they are real and not phony. Yet humans have become so used to all that is falsehood, they are either uncomfortable, or unwilling, to face the dirty, speckled, unattractive physical truth of physical existence, simply because these characteristics do not match their perceptions of clean, unspeckled, attractive bullshit of their delusions, as much in sciences as in their religions, despite that neither their current science nor religions are capable of providing for them the entity they seek: happiness. I happen to be a human who does not fall into the category of any kind of ‘believers’, be it for god or against god. I happen to be a ‘knower’ that gods do not exist. For that reason I am not an ‘atheist’, as you infer, but a ‘physicalist: a person who knows that all that physically exists, exists physically, and undergoes physical change due to intentional (and mostly unintentional) physical contacts; the whole process being described as: ‘the physical process of change’.

*** Finally, segment that you had seemed to acknowledge without too much demise: the part that strongly hints at the demise of humanity. You may flippantly presume that a longevity of a species – any species – is an effortless endeavor, requiring nothing but a ‘hand of god’ to make it so. Wrong. It always was necessary for all species to harmonize in their environments, in order to fulfill the extension of their mutual survivals. Should any dominant species prevail to destroy, indiscriminately, their food supply by either doing so quickly – as with viruses – or preventing them from reproducing and having their own food supply, then these overly selfish species cause their own demise. We, humans, are at just such a precipice. But instead of acknowledging this physical fact and acting accordingly, by not knowing who and what we are, we do whatever we can to continue our ignorance of the physical reality that surrounds us, preferring instead to ‘believe’ in our own fiction, which allows us to believe that our future is full of endless potential, and full of undiminishing resources. This, of course, is a falsehood. A delusion.

*** Now then, Blake, you had published my press release, accompanied by your personal, ignorant commentary. Of course, you had all the rights to do what you did. But you failed to informing me, or my media team, the manner you did this. Nor did you have the guts, or human courtesy, to invite my response to your uninformed opinions, which I had just done. Now I would like to challenge you to publish my uninvited response in full.

Please invite your participants to display, once again, their ignorance and lack of real scientific knowledge, by voicing their opinions without having read my work, available on all major online book stores, with most of them offering discounts, seemingly, so as to satisfy the demand of current readers, willing acquire the knowledge but only for a pittance. This does not belittle the knowledge I have provided, just those who presume real knowledge is worthless, despite having paid a fortune for their currently worthless educations.

Please receive, upfront, an apology for the email address I am using to send this communiqué. I do not have the database compiled by the media team. I came across this email address on your site.

Yours sincerely,
Victor Senchenko